Former Abuakwa South MP and lawyer, Samuel Atta Akyea, has stated that reversing the passage of Ghana’s controversial Anti-LGBTQ Bill could prove difficult if Parliament decides to proceed with its consideration under the current legislative process.
Speaking on the ongoing debate surrounding the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, Atta Akyea argued that the legislation has already gained significant support among lawmakers and sections of the Ghanaian public, making any attempt to halt or reverse its progress a challenging undertaking.
According to him, the bill enjoys broad backing because many Ghanaians view it as a measure intended to protect the country’s cultural, religious, and family values.
“If Parliament decides to proceed and the processes are followed, reversing it will not be easy,” he said.
His comments come amid renewed discussions about the future of the bill following assurances by President John Dramani Mahama that he remains committed to addressing the matter through constitutional and parliamentary processes.
The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, commonly referred to as the Anti-LGBTQ Bill, was passed by the Eighth Parliament but did not receive presidential assent before the expiration of the previous administration.
The legislation subsequently lapsed with the dissolution of Parliament, requiring a fresh legislative process if it is to become law.
Atta Akyea noted that while opinions remain divided on the bill, Parliament has the constitutional authority to debate and determine legislation that reflects the values and aspirations of the Ghanaian people.
He stressed that any attempt to revisit the matter must be guided by constitutional principles, due process and respect for democratic institutions.
“Parliament is a representative body. When Members of Parliament take a position on a matter of national concern, it reflects sentiments expressed by their constituents,” he stated.
With discussions on the future of the bill expected to continue, Atta Akyea believes that any effort to reverse its passage or substantially alter its provisions would face considerable political and public scrutiny.
