Lawyers representing Adamus Resources Limited and business executive Angela List have strongly rejected recent media reports linking them to alleged regulatory violations in Mali.
They say the publications are false, misleading, and part of a coordinated attempt to damage their reputation.
In a press statement dated May 25, 2026, the company’s legal representatives, Apatu-Plange & Co PRUC, accused some media outlets of misrepresenting the content of a letter said to have come from Mali’s Ministry of Mines.
According to them, the reports were deliberately framed in a way that unfairly implicates Adamus Resources and Madam Angela List.
The lawyers explained that the alleged regulatory issues mentioned in the document relate only to a company called MIKO-SA, and not Adamus Resources Limited.
They added that some journalists wrongly described MIKO-SA as a “sister company” of Adamus Resources, which they say created the false impression that the parent company and its leadership were directly involved.
They further stressed that even if companies operate under a wider corporate structure, each entity remains legally separate.
As such, any allegations against one company cannot automatically be extended to another without clear evidence.
According to the legal team, the document in circulation only contained allegations, and these claims have also been denied by MIKO-SA itself.
The statement also raised concern over what it described as a coordinated pattern of reporting, noting that similar front-page stories appeared across multiple newspapers at the same time.
The lawyers suggested this may point to a deliberate effort by unknown persons to damage the image of Adamus Resources and its leadership.
They also observed that media coverage in Ghana appeared more widespread than in Mali, where the original document reportedly originated.
The company believes some reports are taking advantage of ongoing public discussions about its operations to build a negative narrative against Angela List and associated businesses.
Adamus Resources and its lawyers have therefore called on media houses to stop publishing what they describe as false and defamatory content.
They also warned that legal action may be taken against any individuals or organisations found to be responsible for spreading the disputed claims.
