Threshold for a prima facie case against CJ is high — Barker-Vormawor

Constitutional Rights and Policy Strategy Advisor at Democracy Hub, Oliver Barker-Vormawor, has disagreed with claims that the threshold for establishing a prima facie case against the Chief Justice is low.

Barker-Vormawor responded to former Deputy Attorney General Diana Asonaba Dapaah, who had suggested that the requirements for such a case were minimal.

He insisted that the legal standard is much higher and that any move against a Chief Justice must be backed by solid and credible evidence.

“In matters concerning the Chief Justice, it is not about making any allegation stick. There must be enough substantive facts to justify a formal inquiry,” Barker-Vormawor said.

His comments come at a time when public discussion around judicial accountability has intensified.

This follows several petitions sent to President Mahama, seeking the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo over allegations of misconduct.

Last week, the President suspended the Chief Justice after setting up a committee to investigate the claims against her.

Speaking on Saturday, Barker-Vormawor argued that when the allegations are considered together, they meet the strict requirements needed to open a case for further examination.

The controversy has sparked debate about the balance between protecting judicial independence and ensuring accountability within the legal system.

With the investigation underway, many Ghanaians are keen to see how the process will unfold and whether it will meet the high standard Barker-Vormawor insists is necessary.