The Policy–Practice Gap in Basic and SHS Education: How it Undermines Ghana’s Promise
Across Ghana’s education sector, a troubling contradiction has persisted for decades: policies are crafted with ambitious visions, yet the daily realities in schools often fail to reflect these intentions. Governments introduce new curricula, unveil bold reform packages, and announce investment plans—but in many basic and senior high schools, the physical and instructional environment remains largely unchanged.
This gulf between promise and delivery, known as the policy–practice gap, is not merely bureaucratic; it strikes at the heart of learning and equity. A system that regularly over-promises and under-delivers risks losing credibility with teachers, parents, and students.
Understanding the Policy–Practice Gap
A policy–practice gap emerges when the intention of a policy does not materialize in actual school practice. In Ghana, decentralization means policies must pass through regional and district structures before reaching schools. Successful implementation hinges on logistics, coordination, capacity, and continuous support.
UNICEF’s “Bridging Policy–Practice Gaps” report highlights that reforms often collapse at the district or school level because policymakers underestimate the complexity of translating ideas into action. In Ghana, implementation is often treated as a minor administrative detail rather than the decisive stage of reform.
Illustrative Contradictions in Ghana’s Education Landscape
1. Curriculum Reform without Textbooks
Policy intention: NaCCA’s Common Core Programme promised modernized learning experiences with teacher and learner resource packs.
Reality: Many schools still lack the prescribed textbooks, forcing teachers to rely on old books, photocopies, or improvised notes.
Implications: The curriculum becomes symbolic rather than transformative, and inequalities between well-resourced and under-resourced schools widen.
2. Mother Tongue Policy in Theory, English-Only Practice
Policy intention: Use of local languages in lower primary to aid comprehension and cognitive development.
Reality: Many schools continue punishing pupils for speaking local languages, favoring English due to cultural norms or exam pressures.
Implications: Early learners feel alienated, and the policy becomes lip service rather than practice.
3. ICT and Science Policies without Laboratories or Equipment
Policy intention: Hands-on science, practical computing, and ICT integration for digital literacy.
Reality: Many schools lack laboratories, computers, or electricity, reducing science and ICT education to rote memorization.
Implications: Graduates may understand theory but lack practical skills needed for national development goals.
4. Parental Engagement Policies but Inactive PTAs
Policy intention: Strong parent–school partnerships through PTAs and school management committees.
Reality: PTA structures are often weakened or ineffective, with low attendance and minimal engagement.
Implications: Schools lose vital support, community oversight weakens, and accountability declines.
Why the Policy–Practice Gap Persists
- Inadequate and delayed resources: Funding delays prevent materials from reaching schools.
- Weak institutional capacity: District offices and headteachers often lack expertise and tools for enforcement.
- Limited teacher preparedness: Short orientation programs leave teachers unprepared.
- Poor role clarity and coordination: Confusion among NaCCA, GES, and districts creates bureaucratic limbo.
- Neglect of local context: Policies are rolled out uniformly, ignoring regional realities.
- Weak monitoring and accountability: Schools face few consequences for non-implementation.
- Political and leadership discontinuity: Frequent changes disrupt ongoing programs.
- Policy borrowing without adaptation: Imported reforms may not fit Ghana’s infrastructure, leading to unrealistic expectations.
Consequences for Learners, Schools, and National Development
- Widening inequality: Wealthier schools compensate for state failures; under-resourced schools fall behind.
- Erosion of teacher morale: Teachers lose motivation when expected to deliver without tools.
- Poor learning outcomes: Students lack foundational literacy, numeracy, and practical skills.
- Declining community trust: Parents question the value of education that does not translate into competence.
- Waste of public resources: Investment in curriculum design and workshops becomes ineffective.
- Weak national competitiveness: Ghana cannot drive a technology-oriented economy without a strong STEM base.
Bridging the Gap: Pathways to Reform
- Integrate implementation planning into policy design with clear timelines, logistics, and risk analysis.
- Pilot and phase reforms in selected districts before national rollout.
- Strengthen monitoring and accountability systems via inspections and reporting tools.
- Invest in continuous professional development for teachers with coaching and instructional support.
- Allow contextual adaptation at district and school levels while meeting national standards.
- Revitalize PTA and community engagement for resource mobilization and oversight.
- Guarantee adequate and timely funding aligned with the academic year.
- Involve educators in policymaking to increase ownership and realistic execution.
- Promote transparency and public oversight through published implementation data.
- Encourage grassroots innovation with recognition and scaling of local solutions.
A Collective Call to Action
Policies on paper or announced at press briefings do not transform education. Real change happens in classrooms—where teachers improvise, children struggle or flourish, and school leaders navigate constraints to keep learning alive.
Ghana must treat implementation as the heart of reform. Ambitious visions must be matched by equal commitment to execution, so policies cease to be distant promises and become lived realities for every Ghanaian child.
Across Ghana’s education sector, a troubling contradiction has persisted for decades: policies are crafted with ambitious visions, yet the daily realities in schools often fail to reflect these intentions. Governments introduce new curricula, unveil bold reform packages, and announce investment plans—but in many basic and senior high schools, the physical and instructional environment remains largely unchanged.
This gulf between promise and delivery, known as the policy–practice gap, is not merely bureaucratic; it strikes at the heart of learning and equity. A system that regularly over-promises and under-delivers risks losing credibility with teachers, parents, and students.
Understanding the Policy–Practice Gap
A policy–practice gap emerges when the intention of a policy does not materialize in actual school practice. In Ghana, decentralization means policies must pass through regional and district structures before reaching schools. Successful implementation hinges on logistics, coordination, capacity, and continuous support.
UNICEF’s “Bridging Policy–Practice Gaps” report highlights that reforms often collapse at the district or school level because policymakers underestimate the complexity of translating ideas into action. In Ghana, implementation is often treated as a minor administrative detail rather than the decisive stage of reform.
Related Articles
The Jinn’s first visit to the holy Prophet Muhammed, on whom be peace.
November 12, 2025
riability of coronavirus related deaths across nations
April 7, 2020
Illustrative Contradictions in Ghana’s Education Landscape
1. Curriculum Reform without Textbooks
Policy intention: NaCCA’s Common Core Programme promised modernized learning experiences with teacher and learner resource packs.
Reality: Many schools still lack the prescribed textbooks, forcing teachers to rely on old books, photocopies, or improvised notes.
Implications: The curriculum becomes symbolic rather than transformative, and inequalities between well-resourced and under-resourced schools widen.
2. Mother Tongue Policy in Theory, English-Only Practice
Policy intention: Use of local languages in lower primary to aid comprehension and cognitive development.
Reality: Many schools continue punishing pupils for speaking local languages, favoring English due to cultural norms or exam pressures.
Implications: Early learners feel alienated, and the policy becomes lip service rather than practice.
3. ICT and Science Policies without Laboratories or Equipment
Policy intention: Hands-on science, practical computing, and ICT integration for digital literacy.
Reality: Many schools lack laboratories, computers, or electricity, reducing science and ICT education to rote memorization.
Implications: Graduates may understand theory but lack practical skills needed for national development goals.
4. Parental Engagement Policies but Inactive PTAs
Policy intention: Strong parent–school partnerships through PTAs and school management committees.
Reality: PTA structures are often weakened or ineffective, with low attendance and minimal engagement.
Implications: Schools lose vital support, community oversight weakens, and accountability declines.
Why the Policy–Practice Gap Persists
Inadequate and delayed resources: Funding delays prevent materials from reaching schools.
Weak institutional capacity: District offices and headteachers often lack expertise and tools for enforcement.
Limited teacher preparedness: Short orientation programs leave teachers unprepared.
Poor role clarity and coordination: Confusion among NaCCA, GES, and districts creates bureaucratic limbo.
Neglect of local context: Policies are rolled out uniformly, ignoring regional realities.
Weak monitoring and accountability: Schools face few consequences for non-implementation.
Political and leadership discontinuity: Frequent changes disrupt ongoing programs.
Policy borrowing without adaptation: Imported reforms may not fit Ghana’s infrastructure, leading to unrealistic expectations.
Consequences for Learners, Schools, and National Development
Widening inequality: Wealthier schools compensate for state failures; under-resourced schools fall behind.
Erosion of teacher morale: Teachers lose motivation when expected to deliver without tools.
Poor learning outcomes: Students lack foundational literacy, numeracy, and practical skills.
Declining community trust: Parents question the value of education that does not translate into competence.
Waste of public resources: Investment in curriculum design and workshops becomes ineffective.
Weak national competitiveness: Ghana cannot drive a technology-oriented economy without a strong STEM base.
Bridging the Gap: Pathways to Reform
Integrate implementation planning into policy design with clear timelines, logistics, and risk analysis.
Pilot and phase reforms in selected districts before national rollout.
Strengthen monitoring and accountability systems via inspections and reporting tools.
Invest in continuous professional development for teachers with coaching and instructional support.
Allow contextual adaptation at district and school levels while meeting national standards.
Revitalize PTA and community engagement for resource mobilization and oversight.
Guarantee adequate and timely funding aligned with the academic year.
Involve educators in policymaking to increase ownership and realistic execution.
Promote transparency and public oversight through published implementation data.
Encourage grassroots innovation with recognition and scaling of local solutions.
A Collective Call to Action
Policies on paper or announced at press briefings do not transform education. Real change happens in classrooms—where teachers improvise, children struggle or flourish, and school leaders navigate constraints to keep learning alive.
Ghana must treat implementation as the heart of reform. Ambitious visions must be matched by equal commitment to execution, so policies cease to be distant promises and become lived realities for every Ghanaian child.
By Al-Hassan Kodwo Baidoo – Educational Leadership & Reforms Advocate