ELECTION 2024: The peace pact and matters arising

Ghana’s democratic reputation has long been a point of pride, serving as an example of peaceful elections on a continent nearly marred by electoral violence. However, as the 2024 elections approach, the fragility of this reputation is becoming increasingly evident.

The recent Peace Pact, led by the National Peace Council (NPC) and the Institute for Democratic Governance (IDEG), aims to ensure a peaceful election.

However, its implementation and implications highlight the challenges faced by former President John Dramani Mahama, a leader whose dedication to peace is both commendable and unjustly limited.

The Peace Pact, themed “Pursuing Peaceful Elections, Non-Violence, and Justice,” is a commendable initiative. It was attended by key national figures, including the Chief Justice, the Inspector General of Police, and the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission, signalling a united commitment to peace before, during, and after the elections.

Yet, the effectiveness of this pact is weakened by the notable absence of President Nana Akufo-Addo, former President John Kufuor, and the Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu II. Their absence raises concerns about the sincerity and inclusivity of the initiative.

For a pact to inspire trust, it must be visibly endorsed by all stakeholders. Without such visible unity, the Peace Pact risks being perceived as mere political theatre.

Former President Mahama’s steadfast commitment to peace is clear in his decision to participate in the Peace Pact, despite initial resistance from his party. His actions stand in stark contrast to the tense political climate of 2020, when his restraint helped prevent potential unrest despite widespread grievances regarding the election process.

Mahama’s role is becoming increasingly symbolic, resembling the gesture of an innocent man folding his hands. His calls for fairness, transparency, and accountability shed light on systemic issues that remain unaddressed. The violence during the Ayawaso West Wuogon by-election and the killings of eight citizens during the 2020 elections are glaring stains on Ghana’s democracy.

Mahama’s criticisms regarding the lack of justice for these incidents are not acts of defiance; rather, they are pleas for the rule of law.

For peace to prevail, justice must not only be done but also be visibly upheld. The failure to act on the recommendations of the Emile Short Commission after the Ayawaso West Wuogon violence illustrates the selective application of justice. Additionally, the silence surrounding the 2020 election violence, which resulted in eight tragic deaths, erodes public trust in the system.

Mahama’s pointed critique of this inaction highlights a fundamental truth: peace is not merely the absence of conflict but the presence of justice. Without addressing these injustices, peace agreements become hollow and fail to inspire genuine confidence.

The Electoral Commission (EC) and security agencies play crucial roles in ensuring peaceful elections. While EC Chairperson Jean Mensa reassures the public of robust measures for a free and fair electoral process, the controversies that surrounded the 2020 elections cast doubt on these assurances.

Similarly, the Ghana Police Service and other security institutions must demonstrate impartiality. The perception of their complicity or silence in past electoral violence undermines their credibility. As former President Mahama aptly noted, mistrust arises when there is a disconnect between words and actions.

The absence of key leaders at the Peace Pact signing, along with the perceived hostility of certain state institutions towards the opposition, highlights a concerning trend. Mahama’s presence at this event, despite these challenges, reaffirms his commitment to statesmanship. However, his participation alone cannot ensure peace.

Rev. Dr. Ernest Adu-Gyamfi, Chairman of the National Peace Council, rightly observed that peace cannot be achieved through pledges alone. Stakeholders must align their actions with their commitments, fostering trust through accountability and fairness.

The 2024 Peace Pact serves as a reminder of Ghana’s aspirations for peaceful elections. However, its success relies on concrete actions from all stakeholders. Investigations into past electoral violence must be concluded, and the perpetrators must face justice. The government must demonstrate impartiality, ensuring that no political party feels marginalized.

John Mahama embodies the virtues of peace and democracy, but he is burdened by a system that fails to uphold these ideals. The metaphorical folding of his hands reflects the struggles of a man caught between his commitment to peace and a political environment filled with mistrust.

As Ghana approaches the 2024 elections, the Peace Pact must be more than a symbolic gesture. It should catalyze systemic changes that ensure justice, transparency, and accountability. Only then can Ghana reclaim its position as a beacon of democracy in Africa.
Mahama’s call for genuine peace, underpinned by justice, resonates with everyone who yearns for a stable and equitable Ghana. This call must be heeded for the sake of the innocent lives lost, the integrity of the electoral process, and the future of the nation.