The High Price of “Cheap” Green Energy
Green energy subsidies, intended to reduce emissions and spur innovation, have instead distorted markets and hindered the development of cost-competitive clean technologies.
The U.S. solar manufacturing industry is now dominated by China, and European companies own most offshore wind projects, despite billions in subsidies.
Taxpayers, ratepayers, and drivers bear the economic burden of green energy subsidies, which raise costs and reduce economic growth.
Like the Jeopardy! game show, green energy subsidies have been Congress’ answer to every energy policy question. The first OPEC oil embargo of 1973-74 catalyzed decades of energy policy, including the formation of the Department of Energy. Wind, solar, and hydropower subsidies began in earnest with the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978. Similarly, subsidies for corn-based ethanol were enacted as part of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act of 1978. Both were designed to reduce the country’s dependence on Middle East oil.
The PURPA subsidies set off a race by independent developers to construct small generating plants whose output electric utilities were required to purchase at administratively set prices. In some cases, the subsidies were independent of how much electricity the plants actually produced, creating the moniker “PURPA machines,” because their real purpose was to extract subsidies; producing electricity was secondary.
The Energy Policy Act of 1992 modified those subsidies, creating a “temporary” production tax credit for wind power and certain types of biomass generation. Congress also enacted an Investment Tax Credit, initially for solar energy, but later extended to all renewables, which could choose between the ITC and the PTC. Although the PTC was supposed to expire in 1999, it has been repeatedly extended and expanded, most recently in the Inflation Reduction Act. The PTC now includes all zero-emissions generation, including new nuclear plants. Under the IRA, the ITC has been increased, with qualifying green energy investments able to claim a credit of as much as 60% of their construction cost.
Moreover, the IRA extends the PTC and ITC until greenhouse gas emissions from electric generation fall to just 25% of their 2005 levels, after which they will be decreased gradually. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the expected date for reaching that goal is 2048.
The IRA also provides subsidies for “green” hydrogen, that is, hydrogen produced from emissions-free electricity, battery storage facilities, and facilities that capture carbon and bury it underground.
Ethanol subsidies have similarly been extended and increased, with the government now subsidizing various types of biofuels and numerous states enacting clean fuel standards, which, like renewable portfolio standards, require increasing percentages of transportation fuels to be biofuels.
Congress has not been the only institution shoveling subsidies to green energy. Many states have provided their own subsidies, especially the mid-Atlantic states that are forcing ratepayers to purchase electricity from offshore wind projects at prices many times higher than the market. States have also enacted renewable portfolio standards forcing electric utilities to increasing percentages of electricity from renewable sources that would otherwise never be built.
This subsidy smorgasbord is supposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by promoting new clean energy technologies. It’s also supposed to accelerate economic growth by creating new “green” industries and high-paying jobs.
There is little evidence for the former. U.S. energy-related greenhouse gas emissions have decreased by almost 20% from 2005 levels primarily because natural gas has supplanted coal as the primary fuel for generating electricity. Between 2005 and 2023, electricity generation from natural gas was six times greater than generation from wind and solar combined. In 2023 alone, electricity generated using natural gas was three times greater than wind and solar generation.
Moreover, growth in subsidized wind and solar generation has distorted wholesale electric markets, begetting the need for subsidies to ensure existing nuclear plants continue operating, lest their owners shutter them and eliminate thousands of high-paying jobs. Enacting subsidies required to offset the distortions caused by other subsidies is surely one definition of economic insanity.
As for spurring new industries and economic growth, today, the U.S. solar manufacturing industry is moribund, with almost 90% of the solar panels installed in this country now produced in China. All but one of the offshore wind projects under construction or slated to be built are owned by European companies that their respective governments control.
The economic costs of these subsidies are borne by taxpayers, who must finance the additional deficit spending; electric ratepayers who, despite claims that renewable energy resources are less costly than traditional generating resources, have seen their electric rates soar; and drivers, who pay more for gasoline and diesel fuel as refineries have closed or been modified to produce subsidized biofuels.
Those higher costs for electricity and transportation fuels raise the costs of producing and distributing almost everything else, which ripples through the entire economy, reducing economic growth and destroying jobs.
As for green energy subsidies spurring the development of new, lower-cost clean technologies, there is nothing new about wind and solar generation that receives the lion’s share of subsidies. After almost half a century, neither are cost-competitive, especially when the additional costs of addressing their inherent intermittency are included—costs that others must pay. And new technologies, such as direct air capture of carbon, will only be commercially viable if the U.S. imposes carbon taxes of several hundred dollars per ton, which few politicians will be willing to do.
The overwhelming majority of green energy subsidies reward politically powerful constituencies and businesses whose primary purpose is not to build better energy mousetraps but to build only ones that qualify for the largest subsidies.
The government could instead target subsidies solely on true research and development efforts of new clean energy technologies, such as advanced and small modular nuclear reactors.
With the country deeply in debt, wasting hundreds of billions of dollars on subsidies for green energy, as the Inflation Reduction Act calls for, is an idea whose time is long past. Green energy Jeopardy! may be a lucrative game for the lucky recipients, but eventually everyone loses.
By Zerohedge.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com
Saudi Arabia’s Economic Growth Defies Regional Instability
Armenia Seeks U.S. Partnership for New Nuclear Power Plant
The Oil Industry’s Evolution From Bush to Biden
Download The Free Oilprice App Today
Download Oilprice.com on Apple Download Oilprice.com on Android
Back to homepage
Around the Web
Sponsored
12x More Efficient Than Solar Panels? Prepper’s Invention Takes Country by Storm
12x More Efficient Than Solar Panels? Prepper’s Invention Takes Country by Storm
Solar Switch
Urologist: Many Men With an Enlarged Prostate Do Not Know About This Simple Tric
Urologist: Many Men With an Enlarged Prostate Do Not Know About This Simple Tric
Titan Flow
Simple Trick Helps Restore Vision So Fast, You’ll Throw Away Your Glasses
Simple Trick Helps Restore Vision So Fast, You’ll Throw Away Your Glasses
Vision 20
Nearly 60 Pitt Confesses She Was Always the One
Nearly 60 Pitt Confesses She Was Always the One
learnitwise
Add Your Site To This Directory
Add Your Site To This Directory
Ethereal Search Engine
Did Your Mom Ever Make the Paper? Search Newspapers.com
Did Your Mom Ever Make the Paper? Search Newspapers.com
Got Plant Milk? Add These 16 Plant Milks to Your Mug for Health, Flavor, and Fro
Got Plant Milk? Add These 16 Plant Milks to Your Mug for Health, Flavor, and Fro
Take on a Challenge: Make Pasta Al Limone at Home
Take on a Challenge: Make Pasta Al Limone at Home
The Best Places to Buy College Apparel Make Showing College Pride Too Easy
The Best Places to Buy College Apparel Make Showing College Pride Too Easy
Four Easy Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe Online
Four Easy Tips to Keep Your Kids Safe Online
FACEBOOK Twitter LINKEDIN REDDIT PRINT
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge
The leading economics blog online covering financial issues, geopolitics and trading.
More Info
Related posts
Armenia Seeks U.S. Partnership for New Nuclear Power Plant
Why Has the Green Hydrogen Hype Faded?
Hydropower Is on the Rise Around the World
Leave a comment
Most Popular
Oil Prices Plunge on OPEC+ Production Cut Speculation
Oil Prices Plunge on OPEC+ Production Cut Speculation
Why Oil Prices Fell Back Below $70
Why Oil Prices Fell Back Below $70
The World’s 10 Most Expensive Megaprojects
The World’s 10 Most Expensive Megaprojects
Russia Ships LNG Straight to Storage as Sanctions Bite
Russia Ships LNG Straight to Storage as Sanctions Bite
The High Cost of Cheap Chinese Imports
The High Cost of Cheap Chinese Imports
Oilprice.com Investor Series
Get $567 in Actionable Energy Market Intelligence For Free!
Enter Email
By signing up to our newsletter, you agree for your email address to be shared with our third party mail providers.
Trending Discussions
GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
Posted by JoMack
As Biden, the President of Climate Change, and Kerry, our fabulous Climate Czar, who just gave…
E-car Sales Collapse
Posted by markslawson
The story below, which appeared in…
Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
Posted by markslawson
The e-car industry does not need more bad news, but it keeps coming anyway. I’ve linked a serie…
Oilprice – The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
More About Us
About Us
Site News
Sitemap
Advertise with us
Site info
Terms & Conditions
Disclaimer
Privacy Policy
Contact Us
© OilPrice.com
The materials provided on this Web site are for informational and educational purposes only and are not intended to provide tax, legal, or investment advice.
Nothing contained on the Web site shall be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell a security to any person in any jurisdiction.